Please replace paragraph 8 of Section 2F3.a(b) with the following statement taken from the recently released Guidelines for Perinatal Care written jointly by the American Academy of Pediatrics and the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists:
“Individual hospitals may want to continue with the footprinting and fingerprinting but universal use of this practice is no longer recommended.”
OK, I will grant you that something like one in ten baby footprints can be used for ID. We could get lucky, but Obama’s lawyers will put their baby footprint expert on in front of the judge and have him quote the above government regulation based on the guidelines from AAP and ACOG. I don't think a judge will order inking up Obama’s feet, but he/she could. Plaintiff will argue what does Obama have to lose. I do hope to witness such a hearing regardless of how it goes! I am also saying a prayer for the person who left the thumb print on the document.
Well, one thing it should certainly accomplish is to shift the burden of going forward and get Obama to come out of the closet and affirmatively prove with clear and onvincing evidence who he says he is. His position has never been correct that the burden is on the American people to prove he is not qualified, since it is not a right but a privelege to be President. Driving a car is a privelege and not a right and anyone who wants to drive has the burden to prove themselves qualified. It is not the state’s obligation to prove the applicant is not qualified. The same holds true for any job applicant who must affirmatively show proof of meeting the qualifications for the job. The whole process with Obama has been upsidedown and phony but for some reason no one with authority has forced him to prove his qualifications for office.