Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Those fonts look very much like my Olympia, manual typewriter of the time, vintage 1956.
I did see that - that’s why I sent that to you - more to confirm what you said - you don’t put faith in wiki.
Wikipedia, verifiable from other sources:
Post-colonial history
The first direct elections for Africans to the Legislative Council took place in 1957. Despite British hopes of handing power to "moderate" African rivals, it was the Kenya African National Union (KANU) of Jomo Kenyatta that formed a government shortly before Kenya became independent on 12 December 1963. During the same year, the Kenyan army fought the Shifta War against ethnic Somalis determined to see the NFD join with the Republic of Somalia. The Shiftas inflicted heavy casualties on the Kenyan armed forces but were defeated in 1967.
Don’t know if Lame Cherry’s blog has been posted in this thread, but it’s VERY VERY interesting.
http://lamecherry.blogspot.com/2009/08/what-i-can-tell-you-about-kenyan-obama.html
There are a few things which have captured my eye concerning the Barack Hussein Obama birth certificate which no one has divulged which will be exclusive here and point to why I deem this an authentic document and in conclusion I believe I know where this document originated from as I touched on it in my work here recently.
The first tell are the folds of this document. In having examined documents of this period and more recent documents, they in group are all folded into these little office yello sized envelopes, usually with a window inside to reveal contents.
For this to be a forgery, the forger would have to know exactly this process in which birth certificates are in copy handed out to the public. It might sound like a simple thing, but those folds are the one thing which someone would overlook.
Paper color is correct, as is age of coloration, wear on the ribbon ink of the font.
This document matches exactly what it should look like having been generated in 1964 and held in files for this long for “safekeeping”.
This brings me to the source of this. I realize World Net Daily states the anonymous person is concerned about their life, but considering the document is now secured by Orly Taitz, has been copied and is appearing in more places than Obama’s forgery......the lawyers family is not in any danger.
In lawyer, I’m not speaking of Orly Taitz, but the legal firm or family members who had custody of the divorce papers of Stanley Ann “mentaly cruelty Barack sr.” Obama.
These are the papers I featured here not long ago in pointing out that in the strangest of terms, Stanley Ann Dunham committed perjury in stating she was a resident of Hawaii for two years when she was a resident of Washington during this time.
As that residency had nothing to do with filing for divorce, it is now speculated that 2 year residency in lying about it might have to do with custody of a 2 year old Barry.
Stanley Ann’s papers were filed in January of 1964. Her other court procedings I believe in the series of documents shows to March of 1964.
Look closely at the date of this document issued out of Kenya, February 17th, 1964. This would fit the timeline in Stanley Ann filing, lawyers discussing legalities of custody and residency as an America (not a natural born American).
Stanley Ann’s Lawyer would have requested a copy of this birth certificate so that she would have sole custody of the two year old child. See unlike being an Obama in the White House, one does need a real birth certificate in court to prove a child is really your child.
Granted it is not Madelyn Dunham, so we still do not know how a non pregnant looking Stanley Ann in swim suit dropped an 8 pound kid a few months later, but nothing in this has made any sense from the start.
So in reasonable deduction, this is the Lawyer’s copy of the Stanley Ann Dunham Obama divorce proceedings. He kept it in files for his legal protection and the family or law firm kept them as everyone does in boxes of papers which mean nothing to anyone.
This is what I was speaking about in there is more evidence out there than people even know. Someone it is deducted figured this out after something jogged in someone’s memory or someone did a bit of investigative work and was allowed access to these old unsealed files which mattered to no one, except Axelrod Inc.
I actually find it amusing that Miss Tavisham Stanley and Madelyn in Pip Obama’s Great Expectations in screwing over Barack sr. with mental cruelty charges to get custody of this child, lied in court papers committing perjury on residency........then had the audacity to not lie concerning where this illegal alien was born.
THIS is probably what the the 2 year residency was about in being a shifty way of claiming Obama was an American non alien, so she would get custody even when he was born in Kenya.
These twisters have a real Oliver on their hands, as they did not have the foresight to figure out he would be President of some country who needed natural born, and instead went to the expediency of just getting their hands on this child to punish the old man.
Stupidly in the criminal enterprise of Axelrod Inc., in stealing trillions. non taxpayer Geithner, terrorist Napolitano and a million dollars in trying to hide all of this, for one cent this cast of criminals could have used a match and burned up the evidence.
Don’t send a lawyer to do a mop woman’s job.
This all looks authentic and from the time line I have researched, this document fits exactly where it should in a nasty divorce proceeding for full custody of an African child.
While I have thought that the circus of Taitz and Farah with their crew has been doing nothing but publicity stunts and having people chase red herrings, this has a hat off from the person who came forward with this.
It also points to why the people who have been scamming fake birth certificates this past month looking like the Obamaniacs assaulting Lawrence Sinclair, were probably low level plants to guard against this very document which has been picked up on tapped phone and email communications from it’s surfacing.
All of this brings a conclusion this is Barack Obama’s Waterloo.
agtG 246
PS: Is it not interesting that the residency of Stanley Ann Dunham Obama is Wichita, Kansas. That might be another Madelyn Dunham story.
Verify the Registrar and signature and let the good times roll.
” They are afraid of a racial back lash...”
Sorry to say , but I see a race war as inevitable . Might as well happen now while we are still the majority and relatively well-armed .
LOL!
OK...clearly I need a break!
Taitz isn't saying it is evidence, only that it needs to be investigated, to discover the original on file, if there is one, and to examine it to see what it proves.
Did you read her filing?
I assume you're referring to the one posted in this thread, i.e. the Kenyan one, as opposed to the COLB posted by Obama supporters last fall?
LOL.... no. Folks, don’t get me wrong, I’d love this administration to be long gone. Given the misdirection and outright lies told to us regarding TARP, Cap and Tax (trade), and Healthcare, a little bit of skepticism is justly warranted. When dealing with criminals, you need to think like a criminal.
No, no...I mean the fonts on the form its self, not the info that is typed in.
The typing looks normal, it's the printing fonts on what would be a blank form before it is filled in by the typist.
#3465
Just in case you missed this post.
I went out for dinner with friends and may never catch up;)
In 1961, hospitals in Kenya did issue birth certificates. Starting in 1964, so did the Ministry of Home Affairs, the Civil Registration Department, the National Registration Bureau, Immigration Department, Registrar General, National Social Security Fund, and the National Hospital Insurance Fund.
The document below purports to be a GOVERNMENTAL birth registry from 1961.
It most definitely is not. It is a fake and a poor one at that (starting with the wrong title of the document; the wrong official name of the country; wrong name of the province, etc).
Consider these 3 historical facts which the forger got dead wrong:
1. Kenyan official documents did NOT bear the name "REPUBLIC of Kenya" until 1.1.1964, if only because the Republic of Kenya was proclaimed in December 1963.
2. In 1961, Mombassa was in ZANZIBAR, not in Kenya.
3. In 1961, the hospital was called "Coast PROVINCIAL General Hospital".
Sam
PS:
I worked in several countries in western Africa in the 1980s.
Sam Vaknin, Ph.D.
Associate Editor, Global Politician and Founding Analyst, International Analyst Network
http://www.globalpolitician.com/search.asp?keyword=Vaknin
http://www.analyst-network.com/profile.php?user_id=79
Chronicle Media Group
http://www.losangeleschronicle.com/authors/view/941
United Press International (UPI) Articles Archive
http://www.upi.com/search/?sp=t&sLocation=sStories&ss=Vaknin
Issues in the economics and politics of economies in transition
http://ceeandbalkan.tripod.com/
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/conflictransition
Author Archive of Political Columns in "Central Europe Review"
http://www.ce-review.org/authorarchives/vaknin_archive/vaknin_main.html
So for the Cloward-Piven Club, there’s no winning this one.
Indeed, the effects will be global
‘umble is the town name, not his modesty lol. and yes the H is silent.
Ain’t that the truth!
It’s obviously been folded up for a long time. It may have been folded the way it was for mailing to the person who requested it and was then stuck into the records of a case, probably the divorce filing.
Remember when every he would get slightly ahead McRino would come out and say something really stupid. His advisers were horrible.
Yes, that's how it works. BTDT.
I've also been searching for such stamps. Searching also Kenyan coin and paper currency showing "Republic of Kenya" and "1964" or earlier. Will post whatever I find.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.