Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
Excellent question, although, this is the first time I've read anything about the "Intelligator" service and it being searched (specifically) for " Criterion: Barack Obama STATE = IL Search Results: Name: BARACK H OBAMA" (from the main leter, pg 9).
Is it possible that that particular database wasn't searched with that particular query?
Keep coming back to my thilrd grade teacher’s saying: If you want to hide something, hide it with like objects out in the open....Is that what they have done?
AKA New Guinea.....Dad was stationed there during WWII. Airforce base there.
Had a friend who BIL took her husband's ID without his knowledge....What a mess!
So many questions? Honestly, if the man was legit everything should be very very simple. This is outright obsfuction and deception in my humble opinion. Clearly, Obama has a great deal to hide - perhaps a lot more than his birth status but identity also. It astounds me that this has actually occured in the United States. CO
Equatorial Guinea. Little country in Africa.
What intruiges me is the inclusion of Seattle on the top LHS of the posted report. Does anyone know how that came to be there?
I suppose anything is possible with this ilk. It’s just so hard to know exactly but we do know that there is definitely something waaaay amiss here. Dangerously so imo. CO
Thanks justiceseeker93.
This deserves its own thread.
I'll do it later this evening if no one else does, but it's your find and you should get the credit.
If this immigration document is legit, it is a major breakthrough.
And even if it is not, it is still major news in this field, and should not be buried on this fake birth certificate thread.
Ping me to any thread you start on this topic, please.
Not convinced it is fake, btw.
Agreed. It deserves its own thread. I’d appreciate it if someone can take a stab at my questions in post 10,632.
The article was dated in 1992. It states that Roman Obama was 31 years old.
Take B. Obama’s birth year of 1961 and ad 31 years and you get the same 1992.
Is this possible?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2400624/posts?page=18#18
Some very weird s*** going on.
"Equatorial Guinea" could be a humorous reference (fnord) to a "coup d'état" on Fernando Poo.
What intruiges me is the inclusion of Seattle on the top LHS of the posted report. Does anyone know how that came to be there?
"Seattle, Washington / Columbia University J.D. / Dartmouth College A.B." are all from the tail end of a section of Orly Taitz's letter commenting on Mr. Siddharth Velamoor who is Judge David Carter's new clerk (the one from the Obamaish law firm). See page 8 of 14 from Orly Taitz's letter to Judge Carter.
Thanks for the ping ... marking for later read as I attempt to catch up before my next “unavailable” period.
Perhaps, it was by this very (newly "discovered") law, HI Territorial Law 57, that someone was able to fill out this application (?) shown below, for a HI birth certificate that was only ever FILED and never ACCEPTED. Then, when HRS 338-17.8 was passed (in 1982), the record was amended to coincide with the new updated statue...perhaps triggered by someone needing a copy of the original record for some reason.
From the MOTION containing the HI Territorial Law 57 filled in the HOLLISTER v SOETORO case (linked above)...
"What in fact the territorial statute in effect before the 1982 statute sets out is an even greater latitude enabling and entitling persons to register a child for up to a year after its birth and to do so, if not attended by a locally licensed physician or midwife, for the parents or one of them to fill out the birth certificate or for a local registrar to fill out a birth certificate from anyone having knowledge of the birth. Thus a child born outside of Hawaii and attended by a non-Hawaii licensed health care provider or born unattended could get a Hawaii birth certificate nonetheless."
Application?
Let’s keep this issue alive.
Where there’s smoke, there’s fire.
Glenn Beck is way off on the BC issue.
Thanks for the Ping!
Bookmarked
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.