Posted on 08/02/2009 1:35:53 AM PDT by rxsid
Edited on 08/06/2009 12:10:02 AM PDT by John Robinson. [history]
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/
Welcome N00bie TN Freeper..
:)
Doesnt remember being born ???
But does he remember claiming that he was eligible to be POTUS ???
11:50 am Pst Gary reported the court is in recess and finished for the day. Intially Justice Carter was leaning to dismiss the case and accept Defendant's MTD, however Orly Taitz and Gary Creeps made a very impassioned arguement and the gallery burst into applause, the Marshalls did not stop the outburst, and it was felt Justice Carter was swayed by the outburst to not throw out the MTD but rather reconsider his decision. He advised both parties no matter his ruling, both would be able to appeal to a higher court.
Thanks for the update, neighbor..
:)
Thanks, Greg..
:)
TYVM
What does “MTD” stand for?
MTD = Motion to Dismiss...
Barry wants it thrown out..
Thanks.
Of course he wants it thrown out. He loves flitting around on that nice big, pretty jet on our dime. Who wouldn’t?
Gary will be posting more about his take later this evening. His gut reaction- Justice Carter wants to pass this hot potato out of his courtroom. (I'm afraid that ex-marine's knees buckled under pressure from above). Gary felt Carter wanted to rule against but the courts reaction to Orly's and Kreep's oration stayed his ruling for an in chambers review and ruling. It could come within 24 hours or several days. Orly will have that info up when she gets it. Our Congress will not rule on Quo Warranto, I was there in D.C. 9/11/09 talking to my Senators aides, they weren't even sure what a Natural Born Citizen meant. We are under a Usurper I fear, unless God divines otherwise. Steve
“Doesnt remember being born ???
But does he remember claiming that he was eligible to be POTUS ???”
LOL!! I was thinking the very same thing!!
Hi!!
I wanted to say Hello to everyone when I was posting the update... SO Hello to all! I was running out to pick my daughter up for school, I didn’t have much time but I knew you all were all going crazy waiting for an update!LOL!
I could not wait to get back to the house to jump on here to see what I had missed! I see Judge Carter delayed his ruling and I also read on another board he told both sides not to worry which ever way he rules the other side can appeal! I am extremely disappointed, I really thought Today was our day!
The Post & Email just spoke with a secretary of Mr. Charles Lincoln about the hearing, and publishes this summary:
It was a long hearing from about 8:30 AM to 11:45 AM Pacific time, with only a 20 minute recess. More than 100 persons attended. There was an overflow room with video hookup to accomodate everyone.
Judge David O. Carter issued no ruling on the Motion to Dismiss, nor to grant discovery. He cited his need to sort out the complex legal issues, consider all the arguments carefully.
During the hearing the specific agenda disscussed was as follow (this is not in chronological order):
Judge Carter denied Attorney Gary Kreep’s Motion for Severance, which would have created a parallel case, for his clients.
Judge Carter questioned the Defense’s counsel, regarding the method of impeachment and how that would address this controversy.
Attorney Gary Kreep argued that the case does not involve impeachment; since Obama has entered office unlawfully.
Judge Carter questioned on what basis his court could issue a quo warrento proceeding, when the D.C. court had jurisdiction over this kind of proceeding. Dr. Orly Taitz responded by citing precedents in the 9th Circuit, that allowed quo warrento proceedings to be held in California, rather than in Washington, D.C., in account of the great distance to the other side of the continent.
When questioned about the injury suffered by other candidates on the ballot in California, Attorney Kreep explained the injury they suffered and the Judge responded thoughtfully to his arguments.
Regarding military plaintiffs, Judge Carter mentioned that there was a ruling in the 9th circuit which denied standing to oath takers on the basis that this was not a particularized injury.
In all, Judge Carter was very concerned about standing claims and wanted to know what the actual injuries were, and how standing was being justified.
The Defense argued that the Court had no authority to hear the case, and that claims were political in nature and therefore not for the Judiciary to adjudicate.
Judge Carter pointed out that the case was unique and that there were no precedents to guide him thoroughly.
The Post & Email will interview Mr. Charles Lincoln live, and post this in a separate report in about 3 hours.
http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/2009/10/05/lady-liberty-before-carters-bench/
http://giveusliberty1776.blogspot.com/2009/10/1st-report-keyes-v-obama-10509.html
$1.27 ?????????
Its $2.17 near Chattanooga...
Hey neighbor. I live in Bartlett. I tanked up at Sam’s Club on 64 Saturday for $2.11 pg. Lowest I’ve seen in a long time. Makes you wonder when the upward surge is going to happen.
Varies between $2.39 and $2.42 in Milwaukee. Of course we have high gas tax and we’re required to use one of those ‘boutique’ blends because of pollution that blows north from Chicago!
10,501 posts, is that a FR record ?
_____________________________________________
No
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.