Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: central_va
We agree then that the South was not the belligerent party in Civil War; when Lincoln refused the offers of peace, the North became the belligerent party.

Exactly the opposite. There was no offer of peace, just a demand for surrender. The belligerent party was the South, and the initiation of the conflict their bombardment of Sumter.

386 posted on 05/17/2009 4:34:12 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur
There was no offer of peace, just a demand for surrender.

You need the shrink....

387 posted on 05/17/2009 4:55:31 AM PDT by central_va (www.15thVirginia.org Co. C, Patrick Henry Rifles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

To: Non-Sequitur
I guess we have both discovered the secret, since the Federal Govt, won't accept unilateral secession(I don't agree with that, I think the USA will let go peacefully /these are not your G-G-Great Grandfathers Yankees/; but for the sake of argument I'll go with it) then bloodshed is inevitable. The only way to settle this is on a battlefield because of the unyeilding attitude of the Federalist. The Federal Boot will kick, there can be no peace. I am trying to understand that bully attitude. I do hate that thought.
388 posted on 05/17/2009 5:04:47 AM PDT by central_va (www.15thVirginia.org Co. C, Patrick Henry Rifles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson