Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Bubba Ho-Tep
**So what’s your opinion of the clause of the Constitution that allows insurrections to be suppressed?**

One should bear in mind the prime directive to government from the Tenth Article of the Bill of Rights:

“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

As Thomas Jefferson wrote in the great declaration: “But when a long train of abuses and usurpation's, pursuing invariably the same object, evinces a design to reduce them under absolute despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such government, and to provide new guards for their future security.”

As Patrick Henry argued at the Virginia convention which ultimately resulted in the ratification of the Bill of Rights: “Guard with jealous attention the public liberty. Suspect everyone who approaches that jewel. Unfortunately, nothing will preserve it but downright force. Whenever you give up that force, you are ruined.”

267 posted on 05/08/2009 5:40:12 AM PDT by Rustabout (Like patriots of old we'll fight, our heritage to save:For Southern rights, hurrah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 236 | View Replies ]


To: Rustabout
“The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.”

And clearly Article I, Section 8 gives Congress the power to call up the militia "to execute the Laws of the Union, suppress Insurrections and repel Invasions." So suppressing rebellion certainly isn't an abuse of the powers granted Congress.

279 posted on 05/08/2009 8:30:11 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 267 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson