When I first began to study globalism . . . in 1965 . . . were you born yet? . . .
I was still incredulous about all the fringe organizations talking about such things etc.
My boss had already noted that I needed to be less derisive and dismissive because it was the fringe groups that had earliest and most accurately predicted who Hitler was and what he would do.
Then, he suggested that I look up the Boards of Directors of the various globalist organizations . . . and see how many repeats there were on the variouis Boards of Directors.
Turned out to be a rather small club.
And . . . drum roll . . . probably 80% or more of the National Geographic’s Board of Directors were serious globalists.
This was in 1965-69 era.
The Nat Geo—as beautiful as it is—has ALWAYS promulgated the globalist world view.
Trust them at your peril.
BTW, the agricultural science articles have been largely posted by me hereon—extensive excerpts anyway. The photographic proof and other proofs are in the articles.
The other source lied.
You seem to have another flawed assumption . . . that PhD’s are en masse great spellers.
ROTFLOL.
or that we even CARE about spelling.
“When I first began to study globalism . . . in 1965 . . . were you born yet?”
Yes, in my first year of college.
“And . . . drum roll . . . probably 80% or more of the National Geographic’s Board of Directors were serious globalists.”
Yes, part of that vast conspiracy to keep the ET facts a secret.
“Trust them at your peril.”
They have pictures. Something you and your group have yet to produce.
“The other source lied.”
Which is at the heart of your argument. Anyone that doesn’t support your whack job theories is a liar.
“You seem to have another flawed assumption . . . that PhD’s are en masse great spellers.”
You didn’t make a spelling mistake, you made up a word. There are lots of good words out there, no need to make them up.