Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
True.
But I haven’t followed the nun thing at all.
Nun rhymes with ....
Also, unlike your very beautiful picture, nobody had the US Navy position them close up and in front of the occurance when they knew "it" was about to happen.
C’mon, Quix, even the bogus MJ-12 stuff doesn’t look so amateurish.
Actually, it looks like a poor transcription of FOIA documents (there’s a couple more errors in it). If you can’t spell or proofread, then if you want the Movement to be taken seriously with something of supposedly such magnitude, then find someone who can before presenting the world your “evidence”.
Naw.
Would take too much fun out of it.
Besides, that’s part of the authenticity.
I forget where Stanton is now on the MJ-12 docs. He’s investigated them extensively.
IIRC, he was leaning toward authentic in at least several respects last I recall. He has a good doc on his site. I should read it more completely.
Would take too much fun out of it.
Besides, that’s part of the authenticity.
I rest my case.
I guess you’ve never read about atheist
C.S. Lewis’ analysis of The Bible
and how the human idiosyncracies were part of what convinced this master Oxford literary expert as to the authenticity of The Bible.
Why, that was exactly the case, since the US wasn't the only nation bumping butts with ETs. Until nations shared knowledge, each though the other had some spectacular secret hardware.
Several nations, including Mexico, Great Britain, and Russia have started the disclosure process. Mexico has released fighter intercept gun camera and AWACS footage.
By the way, the US government is also beginning disclosure. That is how the material I posted was obtained.
I must assume that you were not "functional" in "pre PC" days. Documents used to be typed on manual typewriters, and carbon paper was used for copies. The Xerox process wasn't available until the mid 1960's, so copies were made using film cameras and blueprint machines. There was also a machine that made "brown copies", but those copies faded in just a few days.
I was an officer in the Army Adjutant General Corps. The only letters that were allowed to be proofed and retyped were those sent to the President or a congressman. Reports were not allowed to be proofed and corrected. This was done to reduce expense and optimize the time of typists.
The documents on the various MJ-12 sites do meet the standards of military reports and assessments. Office symbols are correct. (I bet you've never heard of an office symbol.)
I forgot to tell you another interesting tidbit regarding highly classified documents. Spelling and grammar errors were often introduced purposely in the text. Each copy, manually prepared, contained a different mistake. Records were kept that tracked who viewed or "checked out" which copy. If the information were disclosed they could narrow the field of suspects merely by seeing which "tracers" were present in the leaked information. Also, people tend to correct spelling and grammar errors when they copy documents, so the absense of those "tracers" could also be used to narrow the search for the leak.
These are techniques the Army teaches.
Regardless, something of such earth shaking magnitude looks amateurish.
By the way, what’s your source? Link, please?
Glad you asked! ;-D
http://www.majesticdocuments.com/pdf/twining_whitehotreport.pdf
http://majesticdocuments.com/authentication.php
Military officers and research team members are seldom chosen for their literary talents. Most such documents are prepared under duress, since few like to prepare them.
Is it easy to squeeze good documentation out of the people with whom you work?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.