Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
they are setting themselves up and being set-up as
1. Saviors of mankind and the planet
or
2. Attackers of mankind and the planet
Quix, you are attributing human motives to something completely alien. Why should an alien race care about our well being? And if their goal is to attack, why the delay? There's nothing that any military on Earth could do about it. But you already know that.
Forget the "whistleblowers" and the "insiders". It's pure baloney from those who want to grab some pocket money from speeches and sell books and be on the next Mike Farrell extravaganza*, etc.
*(Oriental music and strawberry ice cream my a....)
People really don't expect to see such things, so they just aren't prepared. Many times, those who do, simply do not think of a camera. You presuppose that people remain calm and deliberate in those circumstances. They don't.
I've yet to see a picture of a C-130 Hercules right over my house, or even a Blackhawk.
If you researched just a little, rather than reacting in a knee-jerk manner, you might be surprised at the evidence available.
Because they are curious, but not inclined to interfere. If you encountered a new species of monkeys during a helicopter overflight of Africa, you would surely examine their habits and maybe try for some close-up photographs. It is doubtful that you would attempt communication. The monkeys would notice the helicopter and probably the occupants as well.
On the other hand, if those monkeys had developed space flight and nuclear weapons, your interest would be more intense.
UFOs probably look as they do because that shape is optimal for its performance. We see them because they are real.
Maybe they fear us because we are obviously better pilots. ;-D
VERY FLAWED ASSUMPTIONS & RATIONALIZATIONS AGAIN.
1. That assumes that “ET’s” are so alien as to be extremely unfamiliar with us. The opposite appears to be true from a number of perspectives on a number of dimensions from psychology to biology and social systems.
2. That assumes that “ET’s” are so ‘out there’ or ‘beyond us’ that we would be insignificant to them to the max. That, too, appears to be more the opposite of the facts.
3. GIVEN The Bible’s indications that this is boot camp training eternal leaders to rule and reign with Christ over countless worlds and ages . . . why wouldn’t the races of the ruled have an interest in their future rulers’ training?
4. IF, as is most probable, the “ET’s” are nephilium, watchers, fallen angels hell bent on throwing sand in God’s eyes as much as possible—the only way being to trash as many humans as effectively as possible in one grand final suicidal orgy of destruction . . . they just might want to carefully plan it with all the knowledge of humans they could collect over the millenia.
5. IF you can watch even 25% of Greer’s DVD full of whistleblowers working in the field . . . many of whom are speaking at GREAT RISK and NO remuneration . . . and still say that . . . THEN you are an infinitely poorer psychologist than I think you are.
If you researched just a little, rather than reacting in a knee-jerk manner, you might be surprised at the evidence available.
INDEED.
Though it seems to be genetic with naysayers.
This is the angle I do not accept. If they were hostile, they have the weapons advantage. It would not take so long to burn us off the earth.
I think they are just "people", members of God's Creation who happen to live "out there", and have the technology to visit us. They don't have to look like us to be people.
Perhaps the concepts of good/evil and free will are universal.
Sort of like a medical team in a helicopter over the Galapagos Islands monitoring the health of the fauna, isn't it? They don't care about our emotional reaction to the examinations; and, we are powerless to stop them. That is generally the way high-vs-low technology and intellect encounters go, isn't it?
I disagree.
1. They are NOT NICE. They do horrific things to people against their will.
2. They lie chronically to the government and to their victims.
3. They are working diligently toward insuring the set-up of the global government to be ran by the Anti-Christ.
They are AT LEAST in cahoots with satan . . . whether eagerly or not is a whole ‘nother issue.
More sweetness from mysterio, I see.
The shock on your face would be very fascinating to observe.
The silliness of ignorant ill-informed assumptions
parades again.
I haven't seen that in UFO reports. ;-D
Belief systems are just that. No proof one way or the other. In the long run, it makes no difference which side of this fence either of us chooses to stand. It certainly has had no affect on my life, other than entertainment and "mind tickling".
There are, on the other hand, people who have had some very unsettling experiences. For them, this has a different perspective.
From what I've read, there are nearly 60 ET races in contact with the earth. Only one or two are involved in the abduction cases. The others are not doing these things.
As for the "devil connection", earth humans would certainly seem connected to Satan if we meddled in someone else's affairs, wouldn't we? We are very warlike, indifferent to the suffering of species not our own, and certainly prone to explotation.
It is simply not logical to assign demonic origins to folks just because they misbehave with respect to our alledged moral codes. The Japanese behaved very poorly in WWII, yet the Bataan Death March was patterned after "our" Trail of Tears. Humans have behaved poorly for a very long time. How do you assign demonic characteristics to an ET race that is performing, in my opion, better than we humans?
What are you smoking?
“If you researched just a little, rather than reacting in a knee-jerk manner, you might be surprised at the evidence available.”
I don’t need to research it. It is painfully obvious that if there were evidence of visits by extra terrestrials it would be an event of such magnitude every astronomer, physicist, and news media outlet would be writing daily articles on it. The fact that this so called evidence is relegated to a few websites ought to be enough to convince anyone there is no evidence.
“People really don’t expect to see such things, so they just aren’t prepared.”
I recall the airplane taking off from Chicago years ago that lost an engine on takeoff and crashed. Someone actually got a picture of that plane just after the engine fell off. It was not sharp but clearly recognizable as whatever type of jet it was. The person who took the picture was not planning on taking a picture of airplanes and wasn’t even at the airport. Odd how that one in a million event was captured on film, but with all the supposed UFO sightings we have never gotten one decent photograph that wasn’t a hoax.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.