Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
You said — “I must have been captured by the evil aliens. They made me do it with Janet Reno.”
Well, be glad it wasn’t Helen Thomas... :-)
INDEED!
Of course there have been sharp photos of UFO’s taken . . . depending on the definition of sharpness . . .
Our folks have undoubtedly taken many sharp photos of craft under production in factories.
And, there have been sharp photos of crashed “ET” UFO’s.
Some of the whistleblowers have commented on some of those sharp photos.
Now . . . how many have been allowed into the public domain?
That’s a different issue entirely.
Of course.
You sound like Clinton and his "that depends on what the meaning of is is".
Quix, you're not doing the Movement any favors.
*snort*
Awwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww . . .
I don’t really care that much about “the movement.”
Those who are aware and understanding have no great concerns about such either.
Those who make a hobby of ignorance will never be satisfied.
A Canon G2, digital... I’ve been looking to upgrade and was thinking, perhaps, a Canon Digital Rebel XTi for the next one...
I suspect there really are a couple of stills taken somewhere in the world. The trick is in finding them, of course.
I've seen a number that are crystal clear. Maybe you don't hang out on the right sites.
“Well, be glad it wasn’t Helen Thomas... :-)”
Yeah, but they threatened to use her next if I didn’t submit to an anal probe. I submitted.
Good decision... :-)
“Authentic crop circles have been verified in several peer reviewed SCIENTIFIC JOURNAL ARTICLES as distinct from the normal crop ground and from hoaxed circles in several respects. One of them is the nodes of the plants have evidently been zapped with something very close or akin to microwave energy extremely briefly. The ground has been dried out extremely dry. Micro-fine iron dust coats much of the plants and ground. There are some other differences I’m not recalling. Also, seeds from within the crop circles sprout and grow differently than those outside of the crop circle. Those from within are persistently more resistent to drought.”
Actually, National Geographic did a program on crop circles, looking at all the evidence and information. All that stuff you talk about with seeds growing differently, etc, is nothing but urban myth, much like everything else you claim about UFOs. I guess you are just one of those people that has such an open mind it becomes a receptacle for every kind of bizarre idea around.
By the way Mr PHD, “ongoingly” is not a word.
“What are the odds that since 1947, (the birth year of this particular New Age kook movement), that there hasn’t been even one that’s even remotely sharp and discernable? “
Considering that almost everyone with a cell phone now carries a camera, the odds ZERO.
“And, there have been sharp photos of crashed “ET” UFO’s.
Some of the whistleblowers have commented on some of those sharp photos.”
Of course, we never get to see them. We just have to accept the statements of the whistleblowers.
“Canon Digital Rebel XTi for the next one...”
Absolutely best camera in its price range.
Then by all means let's see some links. (And no, I generally don't hang out on those type sites. I know what a nuthouse is too, but don't cruise them on a Saturday night).
Hmmm..., that looks familiar...
Is that a museum in Roswell, NM? It looks like it to me... If so, I’ve been there... :-)
—
When I got there, I was “glowing”, having been at Trinity before that...
Which is why I also believe that it's a New Age religion, because so much of what they try and sell has to be taken on "faith" and hearsay "testimony".
The burden of proof always rests with the claimants, but that doesn't stop their banging on the tambourine.
“The burden of proof always rests with the claimants, but that doesn’t stop their banging on the tambourine.”
And they are never deterred when one of their proof positive stories turns out to be a hoax. They just move on to the next one.
;-D
Yep, some of those places can be, well, "interesting".
No picture of a UFO has been prestine, but given the camera, distance, prevailing air conditions, and speed, I wouldn't expect anything perfect. I've never seen a super photograph of an ordinary aircraft under the same circumstances. Most people's cameras and lenses are not much at long distances, especially when motion is involved. This is mostly related to pixel or grain size in relation to the size of the object within the frame. Throw in atmospheric conditions, and there will little or no "quality".
Given the evidence, I assume that some UFOs are ET ships or probes.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.