Posted on 01/17/2009 1:52:28 PM PST by JoeProBono
CHAMA, NM - Several meandering V-shaped UFOs near a mountain slope here turned up on a woman's digital photos. Three photos shot with a 21 megapixel camera caught multiple crafts approaching in the first frame, one craft in frame two moving close to the ground while the others take positions in the sky, and then frame three shows all of the crafts moving out of the area.
(Excerpt) Read more at examiner.com ...
The problem is, quoting eyewitnesses is not proof. Just because someone sees something or claims to see something doesn’t mean it’s from another planet. 300 years ago you could find thousands of people in Ireland who claimed they saw leprechauns, some even claimed to have talked to them. Does that constitute proof of the existence of Leprechauns? Anyway, you are a true believer and I am a registered skeptic, so we are not going to convince each other.
Enjoy the TYPE II error.
It bites just as deadly as a TYPE I error.
bttt
THX THX.
BLESSINGS TO YOU AND YOURS this New Year.
Be safe in the arms of The Lord, at all costs.
It aint the megapixels...its the lens. 21 megapixels still looks like crap when you use a 28mm lens.
And how many webcams are there? I had someone say that they’re not aimed towards the horizon, but what about all those “weathercams” the TV stations set up on top of their respective city skyscrapers? How about web cams at amusement parks and those that overlook a city skyline?
Like you said, there’s no expectation of high quality, but there’s none to be had from the kooks either. ;)
What kind of camera do you have?
Well, Quix, you again have not disappointed me.
You talk of evidence yet "can't recall" even one good shot? A thinking man would question why someone who is so rabid about flying saucers, who apparently can remember how to find unrelated stuff from kook sites like ATS, can't in all these years bookmark or save one single solitary image for presentation when confronted.
Do the ellipses represent stuttering, Quix? Or are you saying Ahhhhhh like Sandy Berger? :)
Where are the facts, Quix? Hell, you can’t even remember where one good image is.
And my sister’s boyfriend’s gardener’s butler’s chauffer’s barber’s mistress’es cousin’s friend of a friend of a friend working for Rockwell is not “proof” of anything.
Being a pen-pal of the most prominent hucksters in the field does not raise the social standing of someone who can’t offer the “proof” he claims exists.
Throwing around terms found in a physician’s reference while at the public library also doesn’t raise the social standing of someone who can’t offer the “proof” he claims exists.
Claiming that rational and objective people “lack courage” to believe what hasn’t been effectively proven is the hallmark of an adolescent kook liberal. Think “global warming”.
As for your point number 7, have you ever read one of Klass’ books without violently retching?
Paid shill Klass?
ROTFLOL
That’s rich.
Humor on this day is a good thing.
Nor a picture of an automobile accident in progress, either.
Speaking of paid shills, would you like me to do a little search on how many times you’ve dropped Stanton Friedman’s name into a thread, when it has absolutely no relevance?
You give far more plugs than is necessary to ATS as well. Do you have a stake in their continuance?
Or maybe you suffer from Type X error, where you have an inability to control yourself and not derail a thread?
*snicker*
Perhaps it is not wise to disclose Soviet military secrets, particularly if your and your family live there.
More cluelessness gone to seed, sounds like, to me.
I actually would not be surprised if Stanton is also a paid shill.
No part of ATS other than a member. They are just the other best alternative news site. And have lots of stuff of interest to the more than 150 member UFO ping list.
Your sensibilities in the matter are of absolutely no consideration at all . . . beyond being supremely laughable.
Maybe not that you know of. But there are plenty of videos of them.
You saw it here, folks!
Quix just threw Stanton Friedman under the bus.
And so much for post 161.
Taken at the same distance and speed, are they more clear than the UFO videos?
Perhaps you could consider praying for the ability
to hold more than a microgram of reality in mind with more than a bit of a different microgram of reality in mind
without the circuits frizzing out.
The robustness of your seeming ability to conceive of a diversity of things being true at the same time without having to reboot or rush out for more circuits seems to be much less than I’d have guessed given your somewhat above average conventional mentality.
1. Stanton is a great researcher.
2. He’s held highly classified nuclear industry clearances.
3. He’s an excellent candidate to become immersed over the decades in the UFO community and then at a critical END TIMES juncture . . . help turn them to the globalist aims.
Here’s something you might turn your researching skills to . . . find out why . . . 100% of the major researchers REFUSE to acknowledge the Name of Jesus prevents abductions.
I don't quite follow your question.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.