[Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus]

Wonder what folks would say if Montana tore up it’s “contract” with DC, due to a bad interpretation by the SCOTUS on the 2nd Add. ?

IIRC, in response to a bad 2nd Amendment decision, wasn't Montana contemplating something more along the lines of a reversion to territorial status?

[silentreignofheroes]

Ain’t got a clue what IIRC means,All I heard was that the state was’nt threating DC,but the RKBA was part of the contract with Washington , not for Statehood ,but to join the Union , (it seems Montana could have cared less) . ,about 1889 ? Have’nt heard anything else. Was it due to disarming the South , Makes one wonder.