Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Well, maybe I overstated Ex Parte Merryman not being appealable. Lincoln could have appealed it to the full Supreme Court if he took the position that Taney’s legitimate Supreme Court Justice at chambers ruling represented the decision of an inferior tribunal.


302 posted on 12/05/2007 9:14:35 AM PST by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 300 | View Replies ]


To: rustbucket
Well, maybe I overstated Ex Parte Merryman not being appealable. Lincoln could have appealed it to the full Supreme Court if he took the position that Taney’s legitimate Supreme Court Justice at chambers ruling represented the decision of an inferior tribunal.

Now you want it both ways. The Supreme Court is the highest court in the land. There is no legal appeal from their decision. If Taney did, in fact, issue a judicial decision for the entire court all by his lonesome then that should have been the end of it. Ex Parte Milligan, Roe v. Wade, Bush v. Gore, none of those could be appealed once the Supreme Court had ruled. Why Ex Parte Merryman?

304 posted on 12/05/2007 10:37:54 AM PST by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 302 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson