Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: wagglebee

Why should it be non-partisan? National defence involves planning, long range strategy, short term tactics. It is not a button you push. It is a game like chess, and not all players are equally skilled.

Even if democrats could be assumed to be patriotic, they do not play the game the same way, or with the same level of skill. I mean, assuming that John Kerry is an honest patriot, would you want him as Commander-In-Chief?

Do you really believe that skill, experience and tradition count for nothing in national defence?


1,115 posted on 05/30/2007 11:00:14 AM PDT by js1138 (The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1114 | View Replies ]


To: js1138

And if we don’t try to make defense non-partisan, we can get screwed in the future. In the lead-up to World War II, the Republicans in Congress refused to believe that we needed to build our military. The result was that in the aftermath of Pearl Harbor, we were totally unprepared. That is when the GOP, adopted the policy of “politics stops at the border.” And we have kept it ever since.


1,117 posted on 05/30/2007 11:37:51 AM PDT by wagglebee ("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1115 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson