Replies

Well, the post is factual. Rudy DID do that stuff. As opposed to saying Duncan Hunter is on the same page with Hagel, which we know is nonsense.

The real question is, to what extent does FR dwell on the various factual negatives of the candidates?

I have no problem with posts about Hunter's involvement in the House bank scandal - he was in deep.

And he did vote for certain GOP initiatives that I disagreed with. I might debate the rationale for the votes, but I cannot dispute that they cast doubt on Hunter's bona fide conservative credentials.

I only ask that the debates be based on fact and not nonsense.