Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: groanup

"...how do you account for the 20% increase in the purchasing power of that portion?"

I won't have to if you tax it away from me when I spend it.


802 posted on 10/24/2006 2:28:28 PM PDT by Skeptic2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 799 | View Replies ]


To: Skeptic2
Let me put it like this:

IRA: 100,000 dollars. Under current law it's worth 80,000 dollars in purchasing power.

Taxable account: 100,000 dollars

Under current law it's worth 100,000 dollars in purchasing power.

Under a NRST the IRA becomes worth 100,000 dollars and the taxable account becomes worth 80,000.

Of course that's the most basic of illustrations. For one thing, you would have been able to accumulate more money under a NRST because the compounding would have been higher without tax liability along the way. Also, your purchasing power doesn't even kick in until you have paid for life's necessities. And, if you're like most people, you'll buy frugally and often used when making large purchases. Finally, as you spend your nest egg between shuffleboard tournaments at Del Boca Vista, the earnings on it will not be taxed.

814 posted on 10/24/2006 3:07:18 PM PDT by groanup (Limited government is the answer. What's the question?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 802 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson