Better read the paper Nightie.You read it in 5 minutes?
"As calculated here, the effective (tax-inclusive) FairTax tax rate that would permit the federal government to maintain its real expenditures is 23.82%."
Re-read my post #96. I said nothing of the sort but I note you're up to your old tricks.
In any event, once a decent dynamic analysis is done, the rate may very well end up lower that the present 23% in the bill (is there an echo in here???).
Would this also be the same study that explicitly calculates the revenue neutral FairTax rate at 23.82% using the same dataset that the AFT formerly used to argue that the revenue neutral rate was 19.2%? Haven't we been saying for some time now that 19.2% was far too low a rate for revenue neutrality? Haven't we been saying for even longer that 23% was also too low?
Haven't the FairTax shills here been arguing for quite some time now that even the 19.2% rate was too HIGH????
Would this also be the same study that reduces the Federal Tax Revenue replaced by 2.6% to get to the 23.82%
Would this also be the same study that explicitly states:
Would this also be the same study that explicitly states:
Seems like this study validates much of what we have been saying for quite some time.