PIGDOG post 273: "I've said nothing about any Congressional action in raising the rate since that will clearly not be required."
When in previous posts you most certainly did:
post 310 by pigdog: "The infamous "unelected bureaucrats raising taxes" ploy you've continually tried (unsuccessfully) to use isn't correct and never has been. They merely determine the split of tax revenue required to fund the S/S entitlement as required by S/S law - which it should be noted isn't part of the FairTax law at all. They have no power to raise (or lower) the FairTax rate ... that's what we pay the "big bux" to Congress for."
post 328 by pigdog: "Any change in the overall FairTax rate would have to be done by Congress, not some "unelected bureaucrat".
post 351 by pigdog: " And to change the FairTax rate it would, indeed, take congressional action."
post 368 bt pigdog: "This means that the remaining portion which is the General Revenue Rate will in effect increase since the other two have decreased and the statutory rate for all three combined must be 23% (or whatever the rate ends up as in the bill) unless changed by Congress."
It is one thing to make a mistake, but to continue to lie about making a mistake is absurd. So you were wrong on posts 310, 328, 351 and 368. And then you were wrong in your denial. But why can't you admit it. You keep changing the subject and making things up. You have basically have come around and agree with lewislynn's point anyways, you now seem to just be disagreeing about how the rate will change. Admit it and move on.
"If you are not a liar, how do you explain this?PIGDOG post 273: "I've said nothing about any Congressional action in raising the rate since that will clearly not be required.""
I explain that by stating that you are merely lying - there is no such quote in that post a clear lie, lie, lie, lie, lie. Got it?
"post 310 by pigdog:"
The same lying technique by you once more. There is no such quote in the post. Liar, liar, pants on fire.
"post 351 by pigdog:"
In that post the discussion is that the direction of the two entitle ratios was downward so that means the posts stands as made and is correct unless you can offer convincing economic evidence to the contrary. Be my guest. Once again, your lie.
"post 368 bt pigdog:"
Same discussion as #351. Same answer. Same lie from you. If you can't stop this overriding compulsion you have of trying to call me a liar about anything I say then I;ll have to gather up your hundreds of posts that show you lying consistently - many right in this thread where right here there are four of them ... all lies - BY YOU.
I have no idea what sort of childishness has overtaken you with this obsession but it can't be healthy for your mental stability. Why is i you cn't grasp that furher discussion along this line is pointless??? Are you truly that ignorant?