You can ask that question until you are blue in the face, I don't see an answer coming anytime soon. However, we could get into a serious debate whether Kotlikoff numbers are in a 'table' or whether they are in a 'spreadsheet listing' as pigdog insists you call them. That is almost as intriguing of the debate on whether these are an inclusive or exclusive sales tax or whether it is some 23% excise tax on gross wages, which seems to be one of pigdog's latest inventions to sidetrack the debate.
"... we could get into a serious debate whether Kotlikoff numbers are in a 'table' or whether they are in a 'spreadsheet listing' as pigdog insists you call them ..."
Sorry, but I "insist" on no such thing with respect to the Tables in the paper. They are clearly Tables which, you might note, are what the paper calls them just as I called my spreadsheet listing a spreadsheet listing. You're "serious debate" falters before it even starts.
To see how all three terms are treated - as I said earlier - read post #421. The government wage expenditures in question are treated as I explain there.