[kevkrom]

Neither am I impressed. If I had the time, I'd tear apart this nonsense, but let me just point out one thing -- for someone who goes on and on about Boortz's misrepresentations, perhaps he should go back for a second and explain to his readers all of the faulty assumptions that go into the numbers put up by Gale.

Anyone who (positively) cites Gale in a critique of the NRST can be safely classified as someone who isn't serious in the first place.

[Always Right]

Anyone who (positively) cites Gale in a critique of the NRST can be safely classified as someone who isn't serious in the first place.

And you could say the same for the paid for economists who the NRST quotes and puts on their website. Economists are a dime a dozen and you can find any number to say whatever you want to.