". . . as well as haughtiness, arrogance, smugness, self-righteousness . . .
"really admirable scientific qualities, those.
You are the one placing your opinion above the training and research of scientists. What makes your uneducated opinion more valid than their informed conclusions?
The evo posters here aren't the ones acting smug, you are.
"You are the one placing your opinion above the training and research of scientists. What makes your uneducated opinion more valid than their informed conclusions?"
I view the above as placing yourself above others without any knowledge of who they are or what background they bring to the discussion.
A statement in which you accuse someone of having an uneducated opinion without any knowledge of them is the epitome of arrogance, self-righteousness, and extreme smugness.
What makes your uneducated opinion more valid than their informed conclusions?
The evo posters here aren't the ones acting smug, you are.
= = = =
Not so fast hotshot. There's no solid evidence that I really seek more than objectively reasonable parity.
And, there you go again ASSUMING about me.
So, which part of my high quality, well earned PhD are you calling uneducated?
Is being insulting a major habit or a minor one? Normally, it's considered reasonably kosher when one dishes it out to take it equitably, peacably.