To: atlaw; FreedomProtector; Alamo-Girl; hosepipe; js1138; ahayes; Luka_Brazi; cornelis; ...
...do the two of you disagree with the notion that high school students and undergraduates should first master accepted rudiments of a topic? What do you mean by "accepted rudiments?"
"Accepted" in the sense of assenting to a received doctrine? Or do you mean something else by that word; and if so, WHAT???
Thanks for writing atlaw -- please clarify.
1,075 posted on
09/26/2006 3:35:26 PM PDT by
betty boop
(Beautiful are the things we see...Much the most beautiful those we do not comprehend. -- N. Steensen)
To: betty boop
"Accepted" in the sense of assenting to a received doctrine? Or do you mean something else by that word; and if so, WHAT??? At the level of high school science, it is all received doctrine. Jeepers, Betty, you have been reading these threads for years and haven't learned enough to know Darwin's thoughts on abiogenesis. How are you going to cram all that critical analysis into two weeks?
1,076 posted on
09/26/2006 3:42:33 PM PDT by
js1138
(The absolute seriousness of someone who is terminally deluded.)
To: betty boop
What do you mean by "accepted rudiments?" "Accepted" in the sense of assenting to a received doctrine? Or do you mean something else by that word; and if so, WHAT??? How about, to start anyway, just knowing what the theory says ... such a requirement would eliminate about 90% of the trolls on this thread from ever graduating.
1,078 posted on
09/26/2006 3:46:20 PM PDT by
balrog666
(Ignorance is never better than knowledge. - Enrico Fermi)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson