Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: agere_contra
The odds are literally infinitesimal that our Universe just happened to get it right. The religious theory that the Universe was designed - and designed for us - is strongly supported by the extraordinary unlikelihood of the Universe being able to support us.

The usual (atheistic) defence against the Anthropic Principle is to take refuge in the tired Star-Trek trope of there being quadrillions of parallel Universes, one of which is ours.

It's not atheistic, it's common sense because it may very well be true. Outside creator, and multiverse are BOTH explainations that fit our observations of this universe. Either could be true and there is nothing to indicate one is more certain than the other. So you can't write off one as "tired" and "unscientific" without doing so to the other.

75 posted on 08/04/2006 8:32:07 AM PDT by bobdsmith
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: bobdsmith; agere_contra
Either could be true and there is nothing to indicate one is more certain than the other.

Hold on there pard. There are some folks who hold quantum interference as prima facie evidence of a multiverse - it is the different universes interacting. And then there's the proposed test (by Deutsch I think) of using a quantum computer to test the multiverse. IIRC, he proposes a quantum computer programmed to solve a yes/no problem. If the computer tells you it defintely determined the answer but can't say what it was, then half of the computation was done in a different universe.

For my part both are too tenuous to be convincing.

88 posted on 08/04/2006 9:25:50 AM PDT by edsheppa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 75 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson