Replies

Sure it is.

Are the scientific types being intellectually honest about their theories?

You can hypothesize about multiple parallel universes that expand and contract, producing "Big Bangs" all day. But if you have eliminated God as an alternative, your "science" will turn into junk. You will reach a point of TRUTH, then turn away for a flawed "explanation" because of your belief that there is no God.

I would just like to know your underlying bias, one way or the other.

Sure it is.

Please explain how my belief or lack thereof in the existence of any deities affects evidence for the Big Bang.

Are the scientific types being intellectually honest about their theories?

Why do you ask? Do you have evidence that they are not?

You can hypothesize about multiple parallel universes that expand and contract, producing "Big Bangs" all day. But if you have eliminated God as an alternative, your "science" will turn into junk.

To which "God", out of the thousands of often mutually exclusive deities worshipped and acknowledged throughout human history and why do you reference that specific deity to the exclusion of all others?

You will reach a point of TRUTH, then turn away for a flawed "explanation" because of your belief that there is no God.

You are confusing a method that does not study deities with a method that explicitly states that no deities exist. As such, your conclusions are faulty. Moreover, you are assuming a conclusion, which is a logical fallacy.