The fact remains there are serious, thinking people who have problems with Darwinism.
Calling them "anti-science" is demagougery, and doesn't deal with their observations.
I won't try and convince you otherwise, you can find it yourself if you want to be open.
Otherwise, I'll engage people as I encounter them and plant a seed.
Good luck.
Depending on the depth of their criticism, it does.
If the earth is only 10,000 years old, computers can't exist.
If dinosaurs co-existed with humans, then there's no such thing as gasoline.
These disciplines are all connected. And the simple fact that you can't even call the discipline of evolutionary biology by its correct name, shows that you don't accept science for what it is.
You prefer to you use the perjorative, "Darwinism", even though it's been pointed out on these threads many times that the majority of biologists have never read Darwin because he's so out of date.