If you're truly interested, you can find them just like I did. If you're interested in merely trying to create an online argument, I won't participate.
The fact is there are some big problems with Darwinism/Evolution, whatever you want to call it. And my previous point remains, to wit:
Good luck to you, if you're truly interested in finding the flaws in the theory.
One would think that, if you truly believe what you are saying, that you would jump at the chance to prove your point.
But you don't.
ASLTW
In other words. you've got Jack Chick.
There are but they don't disprove evolutionary biology or help the anti-science cause.
Plus I doubt that you know what they are. A few interesting examples are that the number of animal phyla have not been agreed upon, that the number of plant phyla is even more hotly contested, publishing of Proterozoic Eon fossils is way too slow, and the difficulties in calibrating the biological clock for molecular DNA and RNA evolution.
What flaws? Describe them.
You state that DtDs are "vehemently opposed" to the pointing out of flaws. Yet, when js1138 asked you to point out the flaws, you declined. So it seems that the only one opposed to the pointing out of flaws is you. Unless you are opposed to the pointing out of flaws in your pointing out of flaws.
I noticed you wrote "...offering the alternative point of view..." (bolding mine). You are aware that more than one "alternative" exists?