Maybe just start listing the scientific assumption that must be accepted in order for Creationism to be true?
Sola Scripture - the only 2 assumptions are basically contained in this latin statement meaning God is not a liar and His Word contains all truth needed for mankind. The truth and meaning of the Holy Scriptures are self-explanatory and self-defined.
Just because they don't explain all the knowledge that mankind has attained does not invalidate them - this is actually done for our own protection from ourselves. In fact, it was the explosion of mankinds knowledge that caused the tower of Babel and it was by God's great mercy and grace that the languages were introduced and mankind disperced from one another - preventing their own untimely destruction through new technologies possibly even nuclear technology. Furthermore, Revelation states that the end-times will have to be shortened to also prevent mankind from complete and total self-destruction.
Interesting that a day later and several hundreds of posts and the pro-evolution crowd continues with the ID/creation drumbeat. Please re-read the article - I'm only looking for a discussion regarding the assumptions and problems found in the related evolutionary theories.
The article is only proposing that an open and honest presentation of facts and lack thereof be taught in public schools. This is not meant to be a defense for ID/creation nor advocacy for same.
I think the best place to start would be with a complete definition of both the Darwinian and Evolution theories along with a complete overview of what these theories predict. Feel free to include proven, un-proven, and failed predictions.