Its called the Bible. Superceeded Darwin by many thousands of years.
The Bible is not a science book.
And the Iliad predates the Bible. Thus students should be taught Olympianism in addition to evolution and creationism.
The Bible is not scientific evidence. If anybody is willing to claim it as such, I (and others, I am certain) would be more than happy to point out the scientific errors and contradictions scattered throughout the Bible.
Examples:
Four-footed insects:
Leviticus 11: 21-23
[21] Yet these may ye eat of every flying creeping thing that goeth upon all four, which have legs above their feet, to leap withal upon the earth;
[22] Even these of them ye may eat; the locust after his kind, and the bald locust after his kind, and the beetle after his kind, and the grasshopper after his kind.
[23] But all other flying creeping things, which have four feet, shall be an abomination unto you.
Coneys and Hares chewing their cud:
Leviticus 11: 5,6
[5] And the coney, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
[6] And the hare, because he cheweth the cud, but divideth not the hoof; he is unclean unto you.
Are you really sure that you want a scientific analysis of the "truth" contained in the Bible?
I've gotten to reply two and already we have two insults.
"What are Darwinists so afraid of?
The evolution of their irrelevancy!
All of that nonsense is rebutted here:"
No need to insult the Darwinists. They will never be irrrelevent even if they haven't figured out the mechanics by which God(imho) created all life they may do so one day and it might not match our assumptions made from Genesis.
All that nonsense? I read the article they were all valid points. You dismiss them as nonsense. Sure, encouraged me to go look at your posted link. Must be an article by another sober rational person like yourself.
Yes and of course God guided the content of the Bible from the thousand and thousands of manuscripts of the time?