Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: netmilsmom

I agree! This is from someone who has been teaching Biology at a community college for over 20 years. They are both theories that man has offered to try to understand the world around him. The only correct thing to do is to present both of them, but it is the Darwinists that appear to fear such a comparison more than the Creationists.

Although I accept the logic of natural selection and realize examples of it have been observed in nature and in the laboratory, it is much harder for me to believe that all of the wonders of nature evolved by "accidental" mutation than that they were the result of the actions of a loving Creator God - whatever mechanism He chose to use.


350 posted on 07/27/2006 7:52:05 PM PDT by srmorton (Choose Life!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies ]


To: srmorton; netmilsmom
The only correct thing to do is to present both of them, but it is the Darwinists that appear to fear such a comparison more than the Creationists.

No, the only correct thing to do is to change science, then the stuff taught in elementary classes will automatically change with it after a few years. So far, no one has even proposed a testable hypothesis to challenge evolution. Science classes are for science.

528 posted on 07/27/2006 9:58:37 PM PDT by Virginia-American
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 350 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson