http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1673360/posts
People can judge for themselves.
Like these posts?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1673360/posts?page=95#95
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1673360/posts?page=110#110
"100% positive proof doesn't exist in science, and a great many people, most more well spoken then I, have shown where she is incorrect.
If you would like the links please send me an private message."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1673360/posts?page=81#81
"I like science, as one can see from my nic.
It isn't bashing to point out that Ann Colter got most everything in those three chapters incorrect. If I was bashing her I would be bashing her on other topics, but I am not. I disagree with her on those issues and I tend to let people know when I disagree - it's just the way I am.
I am sure Ann Colter is a nice person, but she appears to not know very much about science.
Been reading freerepublic for years - just didn't have the time to make an account till now. It takes time and effort to start a small business and having a FR posting account would have taken up too much of my time as it can be rather addicting."
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1673360/posts?page=95#95
No - I signed up for a posting account to correct some misconceptions regarding IPv6 the next generation of the IP protocol suite. Verify this by going to the last page of my posting history - the vast majority of my posts are on science and technical related topics.
Please show where I based Ann Colter - I haven't. I said some one her ideas in regards to science are incorrect and wrong but I have said nothing negative about her other ideas, most of which I agree with.