Thanks, I have reviewed your talkorigins website previously. I have yet to see scientific conclusions truly supporting macro-evolution without a whole lot of assumptions and conjecture.
Most of the pro-evolution books and websites I read jump to conclusions like most of the posts by the pro-evolution group here at FR. "Believe it because we say so"
What about the holes in the fossil record or how about the starts/stops of the fossil record too? The more I read the more I see evidence that evolutionists are willing to fake their evidence - moreso than with any other scientific theory. They also willfully ignore a lot that they simply can't explain reasonably.
Most of the pro-evolution books and websites I read jump to conclusions like most of the posts by the pro-evolution group here at FR. "Believe it because we say so"
What about the holes in the fossil record or how about the starts/stops of the fossil record too? The more I read the more I see evidence that evolutionists are willing to fake their evidence - moreso than with any other scientific theory. They also willfully ignore a lot that they simply can't explain reasonably.
I think you will find that the methods used are compatible with other sciences of this type, and the level of "fakery" is far less than you might believe.
For example, can you name five fakes? (Hint: creationist websites will lie to you on this subject.)
The more I read the more I see evidence that evolutionists are willing to fake their evidence - moreso than with any other scientific theory. They also willfully ignore a lot that they simply can't explain reasonably.
To what other 'moreso' scientific theories are you referring?
BTW, in the spirit of your post, I'd like to add that I've yet to see any arguments, including yours that, were anything other than ignorant unsubstantiated wishful assertions based on fanatical anti-science religious beliefs, not shared by the leaders of the vast majority of most Christian religions.
http://www.apologetics.org/articles/founder2.html
A lecture about the "Blind Watchmaker" theory that you might find interesting.