Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: torchthemummy
Anyone that supports a balanced look at Darwinist theories does not necessarily support a religious answer just like one does not need to have any religious pedigree to be against abortion.

So to those that label anyone that has questions about Darwin theories are only engaging in the same tactic that the left uses to label anyone racist that questions affirmative action policy.

You are correct, sir.

168 posted on 07/27/2006 5:58:57 PM PDT by Recovering_Democrat (I am SO glad to no longer be associated with the party of "dependence on government"!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 101 | View Replies ]


To: Recovering_Democrat
Anyone that supports a balanced look at Darwinist theories does not necessarily support a religious answer just like one does not need to have any religious pedigree to be against abortion.

You are not correct, sir, and the analogy is utterly flawed.

Abortion is a religious and political issue. The findings of science are neither. There is no controversy in science about any of the elements of evolution that trouble the religious. There is no controversy about the age of the earth. There is no controversy about common descent. There is no controversy about the general interpretation of the fossil record or the geologic column. There is no controversy about the interpretation of ERVs.

The controversies that do exist in biology have no impact on these key items.

180 posted on 07/27/2006 6:06:10 PM PDT by js1138 (Well I say there are some things we don't want to know! Important things!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 168 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson