[fabian]

It's hard to debate with someone who doesn't even understand the true definition of science. Please open your mind just a little and check out webster's dictionary. It includes alot more than just the natural world. And if the fossils showed true transitionals slowly transforming the debate would have been over long ago. But as alot of scientists who once believed in evolution have discovered, that's just not the case. I think you are missing out on alot of neat things because for some reason you have a prejudice against creationism and maybe God. I'm not saying that I am at peace with Him myself, but His evidence is convincing of alot of things.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"It's hard to debate with someone who doesn't even understand the true definition of science."

I know, believe me, I KNOW. :)

"Please open your mind just a little and check out webster's dictionary. It includes alot more than just the natural world."

Science is not capable of examining the supernatural/*non-natural* world. Never has been, never will be. You can not name one area of science that does. Physics? nope. Biology? nope. ALL are confined to the natural world. That is why they are called the NATURAL sciences.

"And if the fossils showed true transitionals slowly transforming the debate would have been over long ago."

They do show just that, and the debate has been long over among scientists. Combined with the DNA evidence, their is no question that common descent is true.

"But as alot of scientists who once believed in evolution have discovered, that's just not the case."

Their numbers are shrinking, not growing. 99%+ of biologists accept evolution. It is not a scientific controversy, and hasn't been for well over a century. It's a religious controversy between different denominations. The *controversy* has nothing to do with science.