See #'s 1092 & 1106
1106 is a statement about what he wrote made by another author.
1092 is an excerpt from S.J. Gould concerning Dawkins, yet again not a citation of Dawkins' work itself. moreover, that excerpt does NOT indicate that Dawkins used the ToE or empirical science to DISPROVE DIVINITY.
do try again.
the stipulation was:
"I have never read anything penned or spoken by Dawkins which indicates he considered the ToE to be a disproof of the existence and/or activity of divinity.
please provide a citation, in full, in its context, which confirms your assertion."
Let me restate that, to avoid any wiggle-roo... ah! "misunderstanding"
please provide a citation:
1. which is penned or spoken by Dawkins,
2. in full,
3. in its context,
4. which confirms your assertion that he considered the ToE to be a disproof of the existence and/or activity of divinity.