I'm not. You are--using the bible as ammo. You say the bible sez as long as anyone is true to their own conscience, they are moral (righteous) (saved?). Then you turned around and said if their conscience isn't in tune with your religion's conscience, they must be removed by disease from the dictates of their own conscience, which I'll bet you a snicker's bar is nowhere to be found in the bible, and which is a load of hooey. Socio-paths are not diseased, they are perfectly healthy, per se. As isthe case for fundamentalist muslim suicide bombers--they are at one with their religious affiliation, and not in any obvious way diseased.
I never said their conscience had to be perfectly in tune with my religion. God designed the conscience. He wrote His laws on everyone's heart.
Socio-paths are not diseased, they are perfectly healthy, per se.
There you go with your super ability to read people's conscience again. You just got to tell the NAS about that. Tell the psychiatric associations too while your at it, since I'm sure they still list that as a mental illness.
I've already told you that I think everyone starts out with a conscience, but that if someone doesn't, he is still a creation of God and it is still up to God to judge him for his behavior. But you prefer to twist my words.
As isthe case for fundamentalist muslim suicide bombers--they are at one with their religious affiliation, and not in any obvious way diseased.
Their religious affiliation is not the same as their conscience. A person can easily decide to reject their conscience in order to fit into their culture.
I'm not using the Bible to attack you. I'm using the Bible to show that my positions are scripturally based. That's especially important when you say things like "As a christian religeous argument about morality, this seems pretty much out on the ragged edge of bizarre."