No, not as a 'science' book, a fact book. Science is sometimes right, but also often wrong, and is constantly changing. The Bible is always right, and will never change. The difference between the two seems to evade your limited cognition.
Nicely stated (#290.) That's one thing that gets me. The evolutionists' standard insult on these threads is that ID is not "science". OK, I'm willing to accept that. But what is science? Here they'll provide the most up-to-date definition of science, top of the charts, hippest, with it, dude. 100 years ago that definiton was different, 500 years ago it would contradict how they preach it today, in September, it may be adjusted again. That's fine, that is how human matters work, but see it, acknowledge it, step back and get some perspective on it. This is the best we humans can do with it today, as it was the best 100, 500 years ago. The Bible, as you said, never changes. Everything else passes...
You still haven't answered my detailed post on the global flood on another thread.
The evidence for a global flood simply is not there. The global flood is belief, trying to overrule science.
That the bible cannot change shows that it is not a science book. Science has learned a lot, and changed significantly, in the past several thousand years. The bible is religion, and, as you point out, has not changed.
Have you ever been so curious as to compare the original New Testament to the version you currently possess?