To: PatrickHenry
From the article: "Since evolution has been the dominant theory of biology for more than a century, it's a safe statement that all of the wonderful innovations in medicine and agriculture that we derive from biological research stem from the theory of evolution."
This is a ludicrous statement! If you look to journalist such as this to defend your beliefs, you need to look farther...
Is this author trying to say that we would not have medical nor agricultural science today if not for the theory of evolution?? That is a tough pill to swallow. Do you agree with that statement??
To: visually_augmented
Is this author trying to say that we would not have medical nor agricultural science today if not for the theory of evolution?? That is a tough pill to swallow. Do you agree with that statement?? I believe what the author is saying is that medical or agricultural science would still be in the dark ages if not for the theory of evolution. That of course is the truth.
65 posted on
05/12/2006 12:58:46 PM PDT by
shuckmaster
(An oak tree is an acorns way of making more acorns)
To: visually_augmented
Is this author trying to say that we would not have medical nor agricultural science today if not for the theory of evolution??
Consider the resulting disasterous effect to the Soviet agricultural industry when Stalin outlawed the teaching of Darwinian evolution.
80 posted on
05/12/2006 1:05:56 PM PDT by
Dimensio
(http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson