To: CarolinaGuitarman
I said that there is no reason to take seriously your contention if you refuse to back it up. A contention does not have to be taken seriously even with some evidence. "The Duke guys are guilty"-- to paraphrase Malik Shabaz.
984 posted on
05/02/2006 8:50:51 PM PDT by
AndrewC
(Darwinian logic -- It is just-so if it is just-so)
To: AndrewC
Aha! I think I figured it out! You made a totally unsupported statement, without any real purpose, called it a contention (rather than some other thesaurus-derived synonym), and it resulted in 100-odd posts!
(I need more Brown Liquor).....
985 posted on
05/02/2006 8:53:46 PM PDT by
2nsdammit
(By definition it's hard to get suicide bombers with experience.)
To: AndrewC
"A contention does not have to be taken seriously even with some evidence."
True, but there is no reason to take it seriously at all when no evidence at all is provided. That is the case with your claim. You act as if the lack of evidence you have provided is a strength for your contention. I am sure Tom Cruise feels the same way about thetans and Xenu.
You're spinning like a Clinton. And I need some sleep.
Hope that fantasy thing works out for ya. :)
986 posted on
05/02/2006 8:54:22 PM PDT by
CarolinaGuitarman
("There is grandeur in this view of life....")
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson