If soft-tissue in a dino bone proves dinos aren't that old, then all of the other dino bones should be only partially fossilised like this one. Am I right?
what I find amusing is these folks seem to think that "soft tissue" surviving 60-odd million years is a significantly harder trick than it surviving a mere 6000 years - when practical experience indicates it is odd for any soft tissue to survive longer than a few days to a few years.
decomp is a hungry process, don't'cha know?
That EITHER timeline occured indicates a highly peculiar condition thoroughly inimical to fungi and bacteria - any such condition which could permit a 6000 year survival would, if it endured undisturbed, permit a 60-million year survival.
stasis is STASIS.
...and these YEC folks just gloss right over that, so hungry to bloviate that their brains shut right down.