This is where you're wrong. The skeleton of a modern human in one million year old strata. The skull of a modern mammal in one-hundred million year old strata. The distinctinve spores of a flowering plant in two-million year old strata. Two biologically similar animals with vastly different genomes. Any one of these things would *disprove* evolutionary theory, and scientists would have no choice but to go back to the drawing board.
However, scientists have not yet made such a discovery. All previous studies and fossil finds have supported the theory.
The popular consensus among certain groups of people seems to be there is a conspiricy to hide such discoveries, but, as Ben Franklin said, three may keep a secret if two of them are dead.
Which may explain the accusation (on another thread) that evolutionists engage in genocide.
That, by your defintion would be impossible, and so inevitably such a skeleton would simply be defined either as non-modern, or not found in one million year-old strata. Such as: or or
Make no mistake about it,... They are like modern human footprints. If one were left in the sand of a California beach today, and a four-year old were asked what it was, he would instantly say that somebody had walked there. He wouldn't be able to tell it from a hundred other prints on the beach, nor would you.
Tim White
The distinctinve spores of a flowering plant in two-million year old strata.
What? I think even evolutionary theory posits flowering plants in existence long before 2 millions years ago.
Cordially,