Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852
One creationist response to such arguments regarding human/chimp DNA similarity has been that ‘Chimp DNA has not been anywhere near fully sequenced so that a proper comparison can be made’,5 and that this evidence is just as easily explained (and predicted, for that matter) by the concept of a common designer:

You might try finding a reference from a legitimate source, not Answers in Genesis, an on-line catalog of lies and half-truths. You might also choose an up-to-date reference. The two genomes are now published and on line.

503 posted on 05/02/2006 7:05:41 AM PDT by Right Wing Professor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 464 | View Replies ]


To: Right Wing Professor

You shouldn't be surprised. You are speaking to troll who hangs on to creationist arguments that Ken Ham has abandoned as too embarrassing such as the dino/human footprints.


504 posted on 05/02/2006 7:11:26 AM PDT by js1138 (somewhere, some time ago, something happened, but whatever it was, wasn't evolution)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

To: Right Wing Professor

Answers in Genesis is a legitimate source. Just because you disagree with it doesn't make it not legitimate.


507 posted on 05/02/2006 7:21:39 AM PDT by mlc9852
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 503 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Smoky Backroom
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson