Replies

"Anyone with at least one eye can see you have been caught using Eliza ®."

Are you blind then? It took you forever (yes, that word again; before your brain explodes it is not meant literally, but figuratively. Kinda like Genesis.)

"I got to define the only potentially temporal term in your statement."

No, you got to decide when this thread will die. You NEVER got to redefine words in the English language.

"Ha Ha."

Crack kills. Put down the pipe.

"You've already been clear on your disingenuousness, so your statement is rather superfluous."

I wasn't at all being disingenuous. I was very serious as I helped you make a fool of yourself. :)

"Yeah, you hedged on it. Now that you have been caught you're changing your story so that it was a definite "mistake"."

Got caught? I said I would post forever; I didn't mean it literally, though that is the only way your little brain could understand it. So I clarified what I said. My mistake was assuming you were smart enough to understand a figurative statement. You on the other hand have never admitted a mistake on this forum. Apparently the commandments you claim to follow don't apply to you.

I will in the future never assume you are smart enough for anything. :) I never lied about posting *forever*.

"Nope, the word used was "FOR". You're the one trying to change that word into "OF". It won't work."

You are trying to change the meaning of the phrase. I can understand why, as the way you wrote it said that you were the one integrity challenged. You have lived up to that with every subsequent post. :)

"Calling yourself drunk will not change the fact that you called it a sentence and it is not."

I didn't call myself drunk. I said one would have to be drunk to think your sentence was not a mess. Stop lying. :)

"But it is an understandable statement that went right over your head and caused you to display your hypocrisy."

No, it showed yet again how stupid you are. You are the hypocrite, lecturing me on forum rules while breaking them with every post.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

Are you blind then? It took you forever (yes, that word again; before your brain explodes it is not meant literally, but figuratively. Kinda like Genesis.)

No, of course not, I can see that you were caught using Eliza®. You are now squirming and mewling as is your nature. You can't back up your claim of a screwed up sentence. You've been caught. And again, if you are using "forever" figuratively, you are equating it with a trice.

No, you got to decide when this thread will die. You NEVER got to redefine words in the English language.

And I suppose you do? No way. You left it up to me. I want you to do what you challenged. I want you to do this forever, not figuratively, but literally. You don't get to decide what "forever" means if I don't.

Crack kills.

Then why are you still alive?

I wasn't at all being disingenuous. I was very serious as I helped you make a fool of yourself. :)

Another lie. Boy, you just can't quit, can you? And, quite frankly, you are the Eliza® using fool.

Got caught? I said I would post forever; I didn't mean it literally, though that is the only way your little brain could understand it. So I clarified what I said. My mistake was assuming you were smart enough to understand a figurative statement. You on the other hand have never admitted a mistake on this forum. Apparently the commandments you claim to follow don't apply to you.

You certainly did get caught. You've been jumping from, nothing wrong 1614 ...
"It's not a lie if I don't stop. :)"
to
"Not if I don't stop. :)"
to
"Prove it was."
to
"Which, if false, would still not be a lie, but a mistake."
back to
"Prove it."
to
"If I do stop posting, after I said I would post forever (which btw, was obviously not meant as forever as in till the end of time), I would be merely mistaken."
to
"But I haven't stopped posting; there is no evidence yet I was even mistaken."
to
"But I am still posting. What evidence do you have that I have stopped posting?"
some time later to
"I already said that forever was not the best choice of words; I amended my statement. "
to eventually in post 1685 finally stating,
"I made a mistake. I said so."

Your responses show the path of a liar. Again, whether you stop or not is of no consequence. To you, if you stopped, it would be a mistake not a lie ---"Even if I do stop, it will mean I was mistaken, not lying."

. You are wrong. It would still be a lie.

You on the other hand have never admitted a mistake on this forum.

Another CarolinaGuitarman lie. Here is what you stated in post 1677 ... "I'm speechless. You admitted a mistake."

You are trying to change the meaning of the phrase.

Nope. I gave you the primary definition and it supported me.

I didn't call myself drunk. I said one would have to be drunk to think your sentence was not a mess. Stop lying. :)

I repeat, thanks to you, it was not a sentence.

No, it showed yet again how stupid you are. You are the hypocrite, lecturing me on forum rules while breaking them with every post.

Now, now. Temper, temper.