Replies

I got caught making you look even more foolish. You fell for it for a long time.

You got caught. You can't even backup your claim of an obvious screwup in the sentence. What a maroon you are. You got caught.

Put down the crack pipe.

You are hilarious.

But that doesn't mean that you get to redefine *forever*. All it means is that this will continue as long as you respond.

You are so blind you don't realize you've verified my claim again.

No, forever will still be forever no matter what you say. I already said that forever was not the best choice of words; I amended my statement. You have this thing for *forever* when I have already moved on. Keep up!

I don't accept your tapdancing. You have even hedged about making a mistake during your performance. Which of your statements is the "true" one?

But in that context you acknowledged it was YOU who was integrity challenged. All of your subsequent posts have substantiated that (as have all of your previous posts too...).

Liar. I told you I was speaking "FOR" myself but "OF" you. And I continue to say that. Anything else is your delusion. That is why not only are you not a fine example of integrity, you are a bald-faced liar.

It still looks like you downed a fifth before writing that sentence. It's a mess.

It's a perfectly good statement. It was not a sentence.

"You got caught."

I got caught making a fool of you; not that that was such a difficult thing to do. You certainly needed no help from me. :)

"You are so blind you don't realize you've verified my claim again."

You said you got to redefine what *forever* means. That's nuts; you get to do no such thing. You have a say in how long this thread will continue, that's it. I already said that I wouldn't be posting *forever*, as in till the end of time. I had to clarify that because you are too stupid to understand what I meant (or just too dishonest to acknowledge it; it's a coin toss as to which is correct). :)

"I don't accept your tapdancing."

And your opinion is supposed to mean something to me? :)

"You have even hedged about making a mistake during your performance."

I made a mistake. I said so. I thought you would be smart enough to know what I meant; that was my mistake. You on the other hand have never admitted a mistake on this forum. Apparently the commandments you claim to follow don't apply to you.

"Liar. I told you I was speaking "FOR" myself but "OF" you."

After the fact. After you realized how stupid your post made you look. I don't care what you claim after the fact. :)

"It's a perfectly good statement. It was not a sentence."

If you're drunk, that is.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.