Replies

It conveys the fact you're barely literate. :)

It sufficiently conveys that your blather was addressed.

One sentence for every post that I used it. I didn't use it for most of the posts. Though you weren't smart enough to know anyway. If I didn't let you know, I could have used it for the next few years (which is how long this thread will go). :)

Clinton has nothing on you. Plus, you didn't let me know. You got caught. A few years is not forever, liar.

No, but I do find your hypocrisy and idiocy entertaining.

No, that is your hypocrisy and idiocy you are laughing at.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."

"It sufficiently conveys that your blather was addressed."

And by *addressed* you mean *ignored*.

"Plus, you didn't let me know. You got caught."

No, I LET you know by posting an obviously screwed up sentence. I was feeling for pity for you, having watched you make such a fool of yourself answering Eliza without a clue it was Eliza. I could have done it to you for years and you would not have been smart enough to figure it out.

"A few years is not forever, liar."

I already said it wasn't going to be *forever*, as in till the end of time. Unlike you, I admit mistakes. That doesn't make me a liar, it makes me honest. I can see how you wouldn't be familiar with that concept.

That being said, it will FEEL like forever for you in a few years when most of your posts are in this thread. :)

"No, that is your hypocrisy and idiocy you are laughing at."

No, when you try to lecture me on what the rules of etiquette are here while breaking them with every post you make (you know, the rules against personal attacks), that's hypocrisy on your part. And stupidity.

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.