Replies

"I've answered you."

Are you saying that if I stop for a little bit and then start up again, I have not really started up again? How would that be *recanting*? Even your hero Slick Willy wouldn't be dumb enough to think that. How come you do?

"I've answered you."

In other words, you can't even begin to back up your claims. What a coward.

"You still remain a liar and an idiot."

And you still break FR rules while trying to lecture me about breaking FR rules. You are a hypocrite (or just too stupid to know.) :)

"You admitted your playing of games. Calling you what you are is not breaking the rules."

Um, no. You are the one who attempted to scold me about breaking FR rules while breaking them as you said it. You are a hypocrite (or perhaps not intelligent enough to know.)

"Sorry guy, you can't weasel out of your lies. You got caught. Despite your mewling, you didn't just turn yourself in."

Um, no. I didn't lie at all.

You ridiculed my posts, but you had no idea I was using Eliza on one sentence a post. If I hadn't wanted you to know, you would have not figured out, even after years of posting. You simply aren't smart enough. It BURNS you that I have been laughing at you for about 3 weeks now. I can feel it in every post you make. :)

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

Other of your blather previously answered.

Um, no. I didn't lie at all.

Liar.

You ridiculed my posts, but you had no idea I was using Eliza on one sentence a post. If I hadn't wanted you to know, you would have not figured out, even after years of posting. You simply aren't smart enough. It BURNS you that I have been laughing at you for about 3 weeks now. I can feel it in every post you make. :)

You're delusional again plus you are a bald-faced liar. You did not use Eliza on post 1603,1605,1607,1609,1611, 1614... Ha, ha, ha, you got caught again.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."