Replies

"Hey, Eliza user, you are a liar."

Are you saying that if I stop for a little bit and then start up again, I have not really started up again? How would that be *recanting*? Even your hero Slick Willy wouldn't be dumb enough to think that. How come you do?

"You can't recant because you are a serial liar."

Then why did you say I could? Were you lying, like your role model Bill Clinton? :)

"You need to use Eliza more, her responses are better than yours."

That is your response to my showing you actually did say that there was evidence against evolution being suppressed? I can understand you not wanting to admit it, but be a man and do it anyway. There is a commandment against lying in that religion you allegedly belong to. You should follow it more (or for once).

"Your admission is another piece of evidence that you are a liar and a person who ignores the policies of this forum.... Don't play games"

You've been playing games since the beginning of this discussion. My admission to fooling you continually with Eliza was not an admission of a lie. It was a demonstration of how dumb you could be. You fell for it for a long time. Besides, it was never more than one sentence a post. Your inability to address anything else like a mature adult shows you for what you are.

"And my reaction to you and to you using Eliza was the same, you are a proven liar and an idiot."

You use those words as if you understand what they mean. Which is ironic considering how much they apply to you. Using Eliza was not a lie, and you were the one shown to be the idiot for answering the obviously fake responses as if they were real. Yet again, you got tooled and can't admit you were wrong. :)

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

Are you saying that if I stop for a little bit and then start up again, I have not really started up again? How would that be *recanting*? Even your hero Slick Willy wouldn't be dumb enough to think that. How come you do?

No, it is simply stating a fact, you are a liar.

Then why did you say I could? Were you lying, like your role model Bill Clinton? :)

And where did I say that?

That is your response to my showing you actually did say that there was evidence against evolution being suppressed? I can understand you not wanting to admit it, but be a man and do it anyway. There is a commandment against lying in that religion you allegedly belong to. You should follow it more (or for once).

That is my response to all of your posts. Since you are a liar, Eliza is one up on you.

You've been playing games since the beginning of this discussion. My admission to fooling you continually with Eliza was not an admission of a lie. It was a demonstration of how dumb you could be. You fell for it for a long time. Besides, it was never more than one sentence a post. Your inability to address anything else like a mature adult shows you for what you are.

You are still a proven liar, and self-admittedly so besides breaking the "rules" on this forum. A liar and and an idiot. The Eliza sentences raised the level of your responses.

You use those words as if you understand what they mean. Which is ironic considering how much they apply to you. Using Eliza was not a lie, and you were the one shown to be the idiot for answering the obviously fake responses as if they were real. Yet again, you got tooled and can't admit you were wrong. :)

I recognized your lying and idiocy long ago. I did not put a name to it until enough of the sentences were produced to accuse you directly. When I did, you admitted it. No one would have accused you of using Eliza, with your first single use. And thereafter, you would have the gall to accuse them of being fooled. I will not lose any sleep over your accusation. The fact that you "tooled" anyone bespeaks of your level of response which allows hiding Eliza among your statements. I was not wrong about your lying and idiocy.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."