Replies

"No, it does actually depend on the content of your posts, but since you are delusional you don't know that."

But the issue was about my integrity as regards to my statement I would keep posting forever. On the one hand you claim that my continuing to post is evidence of an alleged lack of integrity, but on the other hand you claim that if I stop posting it will be evidence of my lack of integrity. You have rigged it so that there is no way for one to have integrity. There's no pleasing you. You claim is therefore unfalsifiable.

"No, you answered with citations of me citing myself and other of my conditional statements."

And they showed you claiming in earlier posts there was evidence that was being suppressed against evolution. Which was what I said. Which goes directly against your claim that evolution is non-falsifiable. Which is why we are still going back and forth for over two weeks now. :)

"Let's hope that understanding grows unless it is one more of your delusions."

What about your own delusions?

"I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable.""

So I repeat, that goes against your claim that there is evidence against evolution that is being suppressed.

Without being supported by evidence one contention is no better than another. You act as if the fact that a contention doesn't have to be supported by evidence to be called a contention means that a contention doesn't need to be supported by evidence to be taken seriously.

Unfalsifiable claims cannot, by definition, have evidence that goes against them. Yet you claim that evolution is both unfalsifiable AND has evidence that goes against it (which is vigorously suppressed by a secret conspiracy of evolutionists). There is a deep logical contradiction in your position, and you are not man enough to admit it.

But the issue was about my integrity as regards to my statement I would keep posting forever

There is no issue on that. It is intuitively obvious to the casual observer that you cannot post forever. You are a liar. That is determined due to the content of your posts. The particular moment you stop is of no consequence.

And they showed you claiming in earlier posts there was evidence that was being suppressed against evolution.

No, you displayed my comments that I could contend that contrary evidence would be marginalized, etc.

What about your own delusions?

Yeah, I was deluded to think you would not steal from the collection plate.

I repeat, "I contend that Darwinism is also non-falsifiable."