[Sam Hill]

I gathered from your posts on this thread and others similar that you are a troll. But now I suspect you are some serious psychological problems. (Which I guess goes with the territory.)

I entered this inane discussion because of your laughable claims that Hitler was not anti-Christian.

But your argument isn't with me, but it is with history. In case you hadn't heard, there was a trial:

 

The Nuremberg Project

Installment No. 1 - Posted: Winter, 2001

July 6, 1945 - "The Nazi Master Plan: The Persecution of the Christian Churches"

1. Part I (11,890 KB)
2. Part II (10,431 KB)
3. Part III (8,017 KB)
4. Part IV (10,392 KB)

 A document prepared by the Office of Strategic Services (OSS) Research and Analysis Branch. Courtesy of Cornell Law Library, which holds the original document.

 

 Commentary

 THE NAZI'S PERSECUTION OF RELIGION AS A WAR CRIME: THE OSS'S RESPONSE WITHIN THE NUREMBERG TRIALS PROCESS

Claire Hulme and Dr. Michael Salter

PDF Version

 

2002 Rutgers Journal of Law and Religion

http://www.camlaw.rutgers.edu/publications/law-religion/nuremberg/nurinst1.htm

For your benefit I will post the table of contents from the Nuremberg Trial report:

Please stick to subjects you know something about. If there are such subjects. (Which I doubt.)

[ml1954]

Weren't all of Hitler's followers Christians and wasn't Germany before and during Hitler's rule an almost exclusively Christian nation?

[Right Wing Professor]

So, when challenged to justify some idiotic claims about a Hitler speech in 1922, you post a OSS propaganda document from 23 years later. Yeah, Christians were the real victims of the Nazis.

Go snuggle up with your pal David Irving.