"It's just that some of us think the evidence shows that "our creator" was a natural process instead of a supernatural person. So what?"Holy cow, jennyp...where to start (at least I don't have to take your skull quiz)?!
Oh yes you do! :-)
A lack of evidence for such a supernatural person behind it all, and a ton of evidence for the mainstream scientific explanation. (Personally I think there's little convincing evidence for any of the explanations for the Big Bang that I've ever heard of, but even there, there's no better evidence for some kind of person as the causative factor here, either. I understand that you, being a religious person, have a hard time visualizing that as anything other than a competing "faith". But really, everything is not a nail. :-)There is a correct, historical context to our Creator and it is the God of the Bible.
Nothing like pure conjecture and going so far out on a limb that you fall out of the tree...What evidence do you have (evolution, or not) that "our creator" was a natural process instead of a supernatural person?
You don't have any evidence of this belief...You only have your secular humanist/naturalist faith.
What is the basis for said faith?
Hey, don't "do a Coulter" on us.
It has everything to do with the fact that you have no evidence to support that the "big bang" was only a natural event but choose to believe it was anyways...that is a competing faith.
Sometimes...it is a nail.