[TaxRelief]

Based on these, evolution is a theory.

Good. One last question: What is the "Theory of Evolution"?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"Good. One last question: What is the "Theory of Evolution"?"

Better question:

Why is evolution "too broad" to be a scientific theory? :)

[Coyoteman]

Based on these, evolution is a theory.

Good. One last question: What is the "Theory of Evolution"?

Sorry, I gave you two definitions already, one from a search at ".edu" and "Berkeley" as you requested.

Don't you think you have trolled enough, and that perhaps now is the time to make your point?

[Coyoteman]

One last question: What is the "Theory of Evolution"?

These guys:

Figure 1.4.4. Fossil hominid skulls. Some of the figures have been modified for ease of comparison (only left-right mirroring or removal of a jawbone). (Images © 2000 Smithsonian Institution.)

(A) Pan troglodytes, chimpanzee, modern
(B) Australopithecus africanus, STS 5, 2.6 My
(C) Australopithecus africanus, STS 71, 2.5 My
(D) Homo habilis, KNM-ER 1813, 1.9 My
(E) Homo habilis, OH24, 1.8 My
(F) Homo rudolfensis, KNM-ER 1470, 1.8 My
(G) Homo erectus, Dmanisi cranium D2700, 1.75 My
(H) Homo ergaster (early H. erectus), KNM-ER 3733, 1.75 My
(I) Homo heidelbergensis, "Rhodesia man," 300,000 - 125,000 y
(J) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Ferrassie 1, 70,000 y
(K) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, La Chappelle-aux-Saints, 60,000 y
(L) Homo sapiens neanderthalensis, Le Moustier, 45,000 y
(M) Homo sapiens sapiens, Cro-Magnon I, 30,000 y
(N) Homo sapiens sapiens, modern

Arranged this way:

Source: http://wwwrses.anu.edu.au/environment/eePages/eeDating/HumanEvol_info.html

Any more questions?